Site Content

The issue statement is clearly described in the article "Nurses as well as Nursing Assistants' Decision Making Regarding the use of safe patient handling and Mobility Technology A Qualitative Research Analysis" written by Kanaskie as well as Snyder (2018). This research aims to explore the usage in the area of patient safety and handling (SPHM) in the workplace of healthcare professionals and nursing assistants. The problem statement in the article is significant for healthcare professionals since a myriad of concerns are often raised regarding how they come up on the usage of safe equipment for mobility and handling of patients as well as how their decisions impact personal safety. This study highlights the growing cases of injuries to the musculoskeletal system in healthcare professionals and nurses worldwide. Kanaskie Snyder and Snyder (2018) are the first to have set their research question in the context of current research. The study provides a comprehensive context for the development of complete compliance standards that address the health hazards of healthcare professionals. The aim of this study is to study the processes of decision-making concerning how to use SPHM in medical professionals as well as nursing assistants.

Kanaskie Snyder and Kanaskie Snyder (2018) Snyder (2018) have effectively studied the existing literature about the health and well-being professional health care workers. It is clear of the knowledge gaps that exist regarding the use and application of SPHM technology to improve security standards within healthcare institutions. The researchers have utilized the most recent research to ensure that the report contains the most accurate information on the issue under consideration. Particularly, none the references was published in the 90s. The evolution in SPHM technologies is a field that is constantly undergoing research to find ways to improve the safety of patient handling between nurses and registered medical experts staff (Kanaskie & Snyder, 2018). Based on the research review revealed, it is evident that prior studies haven't recognized the significance of collaboration between occupational therapy professionals in the creation of suitable practices to ensure secure patient handling and mobility.

This piece have not connected their findings to any conceptual framework. Yet, Kanaskie and Snyder (2018) have analyzed the various factors that inhibit the usage of SPHM equipment in context of the current policies on the safety of handling patients. This is why their study draws conclusions from the current guidelines regarding health care. The literature available does not provide any conceptual frameworks for healthcare occupational safety. This means that there is a necessity of developing appropriate models to ensure the safety of treatment and mobility of patients in order to facilitate research on this issue.

Dependent and independent variables are not identified in this article. Kanaskie as well as Snyder (2018) provide two study questions that are indirectly stated rather than hypotheses. The two questions can be reframed to include:

1. "How do healthcare professionals decide whether to utilize SPHM devices?" (Kanaskie & Snyder 2018, page. 140).
2. "How can they balance their choices in the context of personal security?" (Kanaskie & Snyder 2018, page. 140).

The nature of these questions suggests that the research isn't speculative. It's actually part of the framework of qualitative research.

The study is built upon a research qualitative model. Permission to conduct the research was given by the directors of healthcare who are associated with the selected hospitals in conjunction with each participant. After appointing participants to this study, a purposeful sampling of nurses in the specialist adult intensive care unit (ICU) and one medical-surgical department were identified. Participants were invited to participate to participate in the experiment. Researchers created homogeneous groups consisting nurse registered from these two departments. They were however encouraged to collaborate with colleagues of the same unit in accordance with their respective roles. Nurses who held senior positions within their respective organizations were not permitted to participate in the exercise. The study questionnaires comprised of around 25 divided into four focus groups. Two groups comprised 14 registered nurses, while the remaining group included 11 nurses staff (Kanaskie & Snyder, 2018). Each focus group comprised six to eight participants. Deductive reasoning was employed when completing this research paper. The research questions were formulated in light of the existing literature and the basic safety of patients and mobility regulations within the healthcare industry.

The analysis and management of data was conducted by using numbers to identify the participants. The article reveals that all of the participants participated in the experiment. Nurses with expertise led research teams in conducting qualitative methods. Focus group transcripts as well as individual analyses offered crucial ideas and reactions. The coding process involved identifying any concepts that are repeated. The codes were then divided into subthemes and themes with the intention of studying their similarities, comparing and harmonizing the concepts (Kanaskie & Snyder, 2018). The possibility of biases was addressed at every level of the study. The findings highlighted perceived risks as well as co-ordination of treatment as major elements that affected the use of SPHM in health facilities.

One of the strengths in this research is the fact that it provides fresh information on decision-making methods and the application of SPHM technology by licensed health professionals and nurses. Focus groups offered a wealth of resource of information to assist in answering the research questions. Participation by respondents increased and resulted in the gathering of precise descriptions of the experience of registered nurses as well as nursing assistants. But, Kanaskie and Snyder's (2018) study has a significant drawback because the results can't be applied to other populations since it was based on one particular healthcare establishment. This study highlights the importance of collaboration between occupational and physical therapy personnel in the practice of SPHM. The previous studies did not reveal this notion. This research also shows the lack of rigor among registered nurses, particularly in the formulation of decisions about the safety of handling mobility patients. Results of this study draw attention to the necessity of implementing collaborative strategies to strengthening teamwork in the design and implementation of patient-centered care.